MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Localization of chromophore absorption signals in TEM with an improved prism-mirror-prism filter

2000· article· en· W2146174669 on OpenAlexaff
Jason A. Davis, Y. M. Heng, M Barfels, Stuart K. Bisland, J. Gari py, F.P. Ottensmeyer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Electron Microscopy · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer Research
FundersNational Cancer InstituteMedical Research Council
KeywordsChromophorePrismOpticsMaterials scienceMicroscopeElectron microscopeFluorescenceTransmission electron microscopyChemistryPhotochemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A corrected prism-mirror-prism electron energy filter with curved entrance and exit faces was designed and incorporated into a Zeiss EM902 transmission electron microscope. The installation of the new filter required little modification to the existing microscope geometry and electronics. The filter had an energy resolution of 1.1 eV over the full image plane (acceptance half angle 10 mradian). The improved energy resolution was applied in studies of the low electron energy loss region that includes molecular orbital excitations or chromophore energy absorptions. Chromophore signal behaviour under electron irradiation was characterized using embedded crystals of hematin and of the dye mercury orange. Images of these crystals confirmed the expected decrease in signal intensity on shifting the selected energy loss from the region of molecular orbital excitations (less than approximately 5 eV) to higher energy losses. Electron irradiation-induced fading of the chromophore signal from hematin and mercury orange yielded similar 1/e dose values of 1.1 x 10(5) e(-) nm(-2) and 1.4 x 10(5) e(-) nm(-2) respectively. In a cellular context, chromophore signals were obtained from energy-filtered images of RIF-1 cell sections containing the photosensitizer chlorin e6 and from sections of BS-C-1 cells with cytoskeletal labelling via FITC-conjugated antibodies. The respective signals were extracted using a dose-dependent method or a shift in selected energy. Chromophore signal distributions were in agreement with fluorescence light microscopic images, but provided detail at higher spatial resolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Electron MicroscopySame topicPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207