Bibliographic record
Abstract
Zusammenfassung DasLängenwachstum des Knochens wird hauptsächlich durch die Chondrozyten in der proliferativen und der hypertrophen Zone der Wachstumsfuge bewerkstelligt. Dies wird durch systemische, lokale und mechanische Faktoren kon-trolliert. Es muss ein Rückkopplungsmechanismus bestehen, der sicherstellt, dass das Knochenwachstum in Rich-tungder vorherrschenden Kräfte verläuft. Wie dies funktioniert, ist derzeit aber noch unklar. Längenwachstum verringert die Knochenstabilität,doch wird dies durch das gleichzeitige Knochenwachstum in die Breite ausgeglichen. Breitenwachstum erfolgt durchperiostale Apposition, was die Aufgabe der periostalen Osteoblastenist. Diese Zellen werden vor allem von lokalen Faktoren kontrolliert, die allerdings durch systemisch wirkende Signale moduliert werden. Künftige Forschung muss sich der Frage annehmen, wie periostale Knochenzellen mechanische, hormonelle und andere Einflüsse integrieren und damit eine ausreichende Knochenfestigkeit sicherstellen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".