MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146193741 · doi:10.1002/cmr.b.20191

Efficient multichannel coil data compression: A prospective study for distributed detection in wireless high‐density arrays

2011· article· en· W2146193741 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐David Jutras, B. G. Fallone, Nicola De Zanche

Bibliographic record

VenueConcepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCancer Research Institute
KeywordsComputer scienceDynamic rangeData transmissionData compressionNoise (video)Electronic engineeringTransmission (telecommunications)Image compressionImage processingArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsEngineeringComputer hardwareComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Wireless links have been proposed to connect magnetic resonance (MR) array receiver coils to the rest of the system to eliminate the safety and cross‐talk issues encountered using coaxial cables. Analog transmission methods are unsuited because of limited dynamic range and noise figure; therefore, fully independent individual digital receiver modules must be developed. Limited data rates supported by wireless links restrict the number of coil channels that can be transmitted to well below those of the state‐of‐the‐art high‐density arrays that would benefit the most from wireless technology. Two independent methods of compressing MR data prior to transmission are presented that when combined can readily reduce it to one‐third or less of the original amount with negligible impact on image quality parameters such as artifact power (AP) and signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR). These conservative results were obtained from arrays of six to 16 channels which is typical of today's clinical systems and show that compression efficiency improves with increasing channel density. Simulated and experimental 2D spiral data acquired from a standard head array at 3 tesla was used to evaluate AP as a function of compression by off‐line processing. Spectral compression reduces the acquired data by up to 45% using dynamic demodulation, filtering and decimation. Dynamic range compression followed by bit‐depth reduction further reduces the data by up to 37.5% without visible image artifacts. Image SNR improves 1–25% at the periphery of the field‐of‐view (FOV) due to spectral compression, while dynamic range compression results in a uniform SNR gain of 4–8% over the whole FOV. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Concepts Magn Reson Part B (Magn Reson Engineering) 39B: 64–77, 2011

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConcepts in Magnetic Resonance Part BSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207