MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146267352 · doi:10.3917/psyt.154.0027

L'addiction au xxie siècle

2010· article· fr· W2146267352 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychotropes · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsKensington Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesAddictionAddiction medicinePolitical sciencePsychologyPhilosophyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Les États-Unis présentent un ensemble de paradoxes dans (1) leur conception de l’addiction et son étiologie, (2) les tendances dans le traitement de l’addiction, (3) la prévalence probable de l’addiction au siècle prochain. Au moment où la science américaine réduit l’addiction aux impulsions cérébrales résultant de la consommation de drogue, une tendance tout aussi forte consiste pour les Américains à voir les investissements compulsifs de tous types (par exemple, dans les jeux vidéo) comme potentiellement addictifs. Bien que le modèle neurobiologique de l’addiction promette une pharmacothérapie et d’autres traitements médicaux, les pratiques de traitement en plus fortes augmentations (outre l’approche en douze étapes, qui n’est elle-même pas médicale) sont les approches environnementales, cognitives et comportementales. Bien que l’espoir de remèdes médicaux et de vaccinations prédomine, quasiment personne aux États-Unis ne croit que l’addiction sera vaincue, ou même réduite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it