MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146270359 · doi:10.1086/425264

Quiescent Dense Gas in Protostellar Clusters: The Ophiuchus A Core

2004· article· en· W2146270359 on OpenAlexaff
James Di Francesco, P. André, Philip C. Myers

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOphiuchusAstrophysicsPhysicsProtostarMaximaFull width at half maximumLine (geometry)Star formationGalaxyOpticsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present combined BIMA interferometer and IRAM 30 m telescope data of N 2 H + 1-0 line emission across the nearby dense star-forming core Ophiuchus A at high linear resolution (e.g., ~1000 AU). Six maxima of integrated line intensity are detected, which we designate Oph A-N1 through N6. The N4 and N5 maxima coincide with the starless continuum objects SM1 and SM2, respectively, but the other maxima do not coincide with previously identified objects. In contrast, relatively little N 2 H + 1-0 emission coincides with the starless object SM2 and the Class 0 protostar VLA 1623. The FWHM of the N 2 H + 1-0 line, Δ V , varies by a factor of ~5 across Oph A. Values of Δ V < 0.3 km s -1 are found in 14 locations in Oph A, but only that associated with N6 is both well defined spatially and larger than the beam size. Centroid velocities of the line, V LSR , vary relatively little, having an rms of only ~0.17 km s -1 . Small-scale V LSR gradients of less than 0.5 km s -1 over ~0.01 pc are found near SM1, SM1N, and SM2 but not N6. The low N 2 H + abundances of SM2 or VLA 1623 relative to SM1, SM1N, or N6 may reflect relatively greater amounts of N 2 adsorption onto dust grains in their colder and probably denser interiors. The low Δ V of N6, i.e., 0.193 km s -1 FWHM, is only marginally larger than the FWHM expected from thermal motions alone, suggesting that turbulent motions in the Oph A core have been reduced dramatically at this location. The nondetection of N6 in previous thermal continuum maps suggests that interesting sites possibly related to star formation may be overlooked in such data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207