Impact of wind turbine generators on network resonance and harmonic distortion
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Distributed generators (DGs) are being increasingly connected at medium voltage level distribution networks. It is likely that different types of DGs, i.e. wind turbine generators (WTGs), photovoltaic solar systems, etc, may be connected on the same feeder. Most of the modern DGs are equipped with power electronic converters at their terminals, which act as sources of harmonic injection into the network. Any distribution feeder system will have its own network resonant frequencies. In this paper, the impact of WTG connections on resonant modes of system impedance and total harmonic distortion in the network are discussed in detail. First, a representative study system is devised where the impact of different elements of power system on system resonance frequencies is analyzed. Then the influence of system background harmonics on harmonic distortion is shown for the study system as well as for one of the actual Hydro One distribution feeder systems. It is shown that several scenarios are possible when these resonant frequencies align with harmonic frequencies that are likely to be injected by other power electronic based system equipment including DGs, thus causing unacceptable total harmonic distortion. The understanding will be useful to utilities for avoiding network resonance based harmonic amplification in distribution systems where wind farms and/or inverter based generation systems are integrated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it