On the possible formation of Si=O, Si=S, and Si=Se double bonds via the reaction of silylenes with oxirane, thiirane, and selenirane, respectively. An ab initio theoretical study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reactions between silylene, H2Si, and the three-membered ring compounds, oxirane (9), thiirane (10), and selenirane (11), which provide possible routes to Si=X (X = O, S, Se) double bonds were studied by ab initio calculations at the MP2 and QCISD correlated levels of theory employing the polarized 6-31G** basis set. The calculations show that the three reactions are all highly exothermic, (61.8, 45.2, 52.9 kcal/mol at MP2/6-31G**//MP2/6-31G** for X = O, S, Se, respectively). In the gas phase, at 0 K, these reactions are predicted to be also spontaneous (i.e., the calculated transition states are lower in energy than the reactants). At 298 K, entropy contributions result in small barriers on the ΔG surface for X = O, S (7.4 kcal/mol for both reactions at QCISD (full)/6-31G**), but for X = Se the reaction remains spontaneous. Thus, the calculations suggest that these reactions are viable routes for the preparation of compounds with Si=X (X = O, S, Se) double bonds. The first step in all the reactions is the barrier-less formation of an encounter-complex between the silylene and the X atom of the precursor. For X = O, S, these complexes are predicted to be sufficiently stable to be observed in a matrix. The reaction steps which follow depend on X; for X = O fragmentation of the silylene-XC2H4 complex proceeds in two steps via a biradical intermediate, while for X = S and X = Se the fragmentation occurs in a single step. The first ab initio calculations for H2Si=Se are reported.Key words: silylene, silanone, silanethione, silaneselone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".