MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146304716 · doi:10.1093/ckj/sft030

Gemella sanguinis endocarditis with c-ANCA/anti-PR-3-associated immune complex necrotizing glomerulonephritis with a 'full-house' pattern on immunofluorescence microscopy

2013· article· en· W2146304716 on OpenAlexafffund
Mathieu Rousseau‐Gagnon, Julie Riopel, Anne E. Desjardins, Dylan Garceau, Mohsen Agharazii, Simon Desmeules

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Kidney Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsHôtel-Dieu de Québec
FundersCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec
KeywordsMedicineGlomerulonephritisRenal biopsyLupus nephritisEndocarditisPathologyImmunofluorescenceBiopsyCreatinineRapidly progressive glomerulonephritisKidneyAntibodyInternal medicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 67-year-old man was evaluated for haematuria, with a rising creatinine level from 88 to 906 µmol/L and positive c-anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)/anti-proteinase 3 (anti-PR3). A kidney biopsy revealed necrotizing glomerulonephritis with a 'full-house' pattern on immunofluorescence microscopy. Echocardiography and blood cultures growing Gemella sanguinis diagnosed endocarditis. Dialysis was required for a month. Three months later, following valve replacement, glucocorticoids and 2 months of antibiotic therapy, the creatinine level decreased to 62 µmol/L and c-ANCA/anti-PR3 disappeared. This first case of c-ANCA/anti-PR3 positive glomerulonephritis with a 'full-house' immunofluorescence pattern due to bacterial endocarditis underlines the importance of ruling out infection with ANCA positivity or kidney biopsy suggestive of lupus nephritis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Kidney JournalSame topicInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207