MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146305126 · doi:10.1109/psce.2011.5772611

Novel application of a PV solar plant as STATCOM during night and day in a distribution utility network

2011· article· en· W2146305126 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rajiv K. Varma, Shriram S. Rangarajan, Iurie Axente, Vinay Sharma

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsLondon HydroWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemGrid-connected photovoltaic power systemAutomotive engineeringInverterCompensation (psychology)EngineeringElectrical engineeringController (irrigation)Charge controllerSolar powerPower (physics)VoltageMaximum power point trackingBattery (electricity)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PV solar farms produce power during the day and are completely idle in the nights. This paper presents a novel utilization of a PV solar plant as STATCOM in the night for load reactive power compensation and voltage control. This STATCOM functionality will also be available to a substantial degree during the daytime with the inverter capacity remaining after real power production. The local distribution company London Hydro is implementing this new technology, for the first time in Canada, on a 10 kW solar system to be installed on the rooftop of their headquarters building. The PV solar plant inverter controller will be designed, developed and tested in the university Lab and will then be installed in field by Spring 2011. This paper presents the EMTDC/PSCAD simulation studies of the performance of the 10 kW PV solar plant as a STATCOM. The benefits of employing such a new control of the PV solar system as a Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS) device are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207