MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

State-dependent errors in a land surface model across biomes inferred from eddy covariance observations on multiple timescales

2012· article· en· W2146323868 on OpenAlex
Tao Wang, Pierre Brender, Philippe Ciais, Shilong Piao, Miguel D. Mahecha, Frédéric Chevallier, Markus Reichstein, Catherine Ottlé, Fabienne Maignan, M. Altaf Arain, Gil Bohrer, Alessandro Cescatti, Gerard Kiely, B. E. Law, Leonardo Montagnani, Eddy Moors, Bruce Osborne, O. Panferov, Dario Papale, Francesco Primo Vaccari

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcological Modelling · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryOak Ridge National LaboratoryMicrosoft ResearchU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsEddy covarianceBiomeEnvironmental scienceClimatologySensible heatPredictabilityFlux (metallurgy)Plant functional typeAtmospheric sciencesEcosystemEcosystem respirationClimate modelCovarianceClimate changeEcologyStatisticsMathematicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it