MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146329535 · doi:10.1139/l03-047

An effective peak stress formula for concrete confined with carbon fiber reinforced plastics

2003· article· en· W2146329535 on OpenAlex
Chih-Tsung Lin, Yeou-Fong Li

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceStress (linguistics)Composite materialCompressive strengthReinforced concreteCompression (physics)Structural engineeringFiberGeotechnical engineeringGeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The uniaxial compression test results of three different strengths and three different sizes of concrete cylinders confined with different layers of carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP) are used to develop an effective peak stress formula for predicting the strength of confined concrete. The theory of this peak stress formula was based on the triaxial confined test of soil and rock, and the lateral confinement of the concrete was assumed to be due to the CFRP. The peak stress of the confined concrete can be explicitly expressed as a function of the unconfined concrete strength and the lateral CFRP confined strength. Experiments were done on 108 concrete cylinders, and the test results show the accuracy and effectiveness of this peak stress formulation of confined concrete.Key words: confined concrete, peak stress, carbon fiber reinforced plastics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.308
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it