Robust performance analysis of a controlled synchronous machine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work we investigate the robust performance of a controller which was originally proposed by M. Araki et al. (see Eighth IFAC World Congress, Kyoto, Japan, p.3123-35, 1981) to control a synchronous machine connected to an infinite bus through a transmission line. The objectives of the design by Araki et. al. were to ensure (1) satisfactory voltage regulation in the pre-fault state and (2) satisfactory transient response in the post-fault state. The pre-fault and post-fault states are characterized by two extreme values of the line reactance X/sub e/, namely X/sub e1/=0.5 and X/sub e2/=0.8. However, as pointed out by Araki et. al., the controller is required to exhibit a satisfactory performance for a variety of operating conditions. In this article we analyze the robustness of the proposed controller for an uncertain value of the line reactance X/sub e/.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".