High-Throughput Automated Injection of Individual Biological Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ability of efficiently delivering soluable/insoluable drug compounds or biomolecules into individual biological cells and quantifying their cellular responses is important for genetics, proteomics, and drug discovery. This paper presents a fully automated system for zebrafish embryo injection, which overcomes the problems inherent in manual injection, such as human fatigue and large variations in success rates due to poor reproducibility. Based on ldquolooking-then-movingrdquo control, the microrobotic system performs injection at a speed of 15 zebrafish embryos (chorion unremoved) per minute. Besides a high injection speed that compares favorably with that of a highly proficient injection technician, a vacuum-based embryo holding device enables fast immobilization of a large number of zebrafish embryos, shortening the embryo patterning process from minutes to seconds. The recognition of embryo structures from image processing identifies a desired destination inside the embryo for material deposition, together with precise motion control resulting in a success rate of 100%. Carefully tuning suction pressure levels as well as injection and retraction speeds produced a high survival rate of 98%. The quantitative performance evaluation of the automated system was based on the continuous injection of 250 zebrafish embryos. The technologies can be extended to other biological injection applications such as the injection of mouse embryos,Drosophilaembryos, andC.elegansto enable high-throughput biological and pharmaceutical research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".