Single impurity Anderson model and band anti‐crossing in the Ga<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>In<i><sub>x</sub></i> N<i><sub>y</sub></i> As<sub>1–<i>y</i></sub> material system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The role of the single‐N impurity in the GaInNAs system is evaluated using the single impurity Anderson model. The N impurities can act either as scattering resonances or as bound states depending on their energy position. For the former case, using self‐energy calculations and Matsubara Green's functions we investigate the nature of the mixed single‐N state (energy broadening, shift). The effect of this interaction on the perturbed conduction subbands is also examined. The single impurity Anderson model results in a complex band structure. The real part of the band structure can be directly related to the dispersion obtained with the band anti‐crossing model and is in very good agreement. The imaginary bandstructure contains further information about the mixing of the nitrogen state and the conduction band which is not contained within the band anti‐crossing model. (© 2008 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".