Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dipmeter is a well logging tool for measuring formation dip, that is, the angle and the direction of the tilt of the underground formation. It does this by measuring focused microresistivity in a few places on the circumference of the hole. If the formation is dipping the resulting measurements will be displaced in relation to each other. From these displacements one can compute the dip by applying standard formulas of analytical geometry. However, finding these displacements is far from a standard problem. The need for effective reservoir description poses ever great challenges and necessitates the development of better, more stable and precise dip computation algorithms. This paper describes a development environment which was designed and programmed specifically to develop and test dip computation algorithms. The author describes the geological considerations that went into the design and their implementation. The author also briefly discusses the results achieved using this environment, namely, new dip computation algorithms. The immediate benefit of the DATE workbench is therefore the development of new dip computation algorithms. In addition, it can serve either as a base or as a model for developing processing algorithms for other tools.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".