Maximum Network Lifetime in Interference-Aware WiMax/802.16 Mesh Centralized Scheduling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
WiMax/802.16 mesh network is an emerging infrastructure that offers a cost-effective deployment for high-speed wireless broadband access to the back haul network. In order to provide the best cost-effective deployment solution, nodes must be powered by batteries which do not require electrical cables and voltage transformers deployment (city power lines voltage is not suited to WiMax/802.16 nodes voltage). Moreover this deployment approach (the only one compatible with a mobile nodes topology) is environment constraint free since not all cities have easy-reachable power lines (e.g. rural cities). However it requires a predictive mechanism to calculate the lifetime of the network, in purpose to provide the adequate maintenance (recharge/change nodes batteries, reconfigure the nodes) at the appropriate time. We study the problem of maximizing the network lifetime (MNL) in order to minimize the maintenance of WiMax/802.16 mesh centralized scheduling networks powered by batteries which causes them to go off line. Moreover our study incorporates an explicit novel modeling of interference and hidden terminal nodes using an appropriate time slot allocation. Results show that power aware routing and a convenient frame size improve the network lifetime.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it