MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146454293 · doi:10.1109/pac.1993.308650

Interleaved wide and narrow pulses for the KAON factory 1 MHz chopper

2002· article· en· W2146454293 on OpenAlexaff
G.D. Wait, Michael Barnes, D. Bishop, G. Waters

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChopperCyclotronPhysicsBeam (structure)Duty cyclePulse (music)SynchrotronStorage ringNuclear physicsOpticsAtomic physicsDetectorVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A beam chopper is required in the transfer line between the 1 GeV/c TRIUMF cyclotron and the Accumulator ring of the proposed 30 GeV/c KAON Factory synchrotron. The beam chopper must generate pulses with a magnitude of at least 9.5 kV with rise and fall times of less than 38 ns (corresponds to kick rise/fall time of less than 39 ns) at a repetition rate of 10/sup 6/ pulses per second at a 100% duty cycle. The pulse pattern must be synchronized to the 23 MHz RF system for the TRIUMF cyclotron. Two different pulse widths are required to deflect a total of 5 beam bursts out of every 45 beam bursts that are extracted from the cyclotron. The inter-leaved pulses will have flattop durations of more than 48 ns and 92 ns. Results of measurements on a prototype chopper are presented where pulses of two different widths are synchronized to an RF synthesizer and stored in a low loss delay cable. Rise and fall times of 20 ns to 40 ns have been achieved with 12 kV to 15 kV wide and narrow pulses at 1.9/spl times/10/sup 6/ pulses per second continuous operation.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207