MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146482784 · doi:10.1006/cbir.2001.0827

p53‐LIKE PROTEIN BINDING AFFINITY TO THE HORMONE RESPONSIVE ELEMENT OF THE HAPTOGLOBIN GENE IN FETAL RAT LIVER

2002· article· en· W2146482784 on OpenAlexaff
Desanka Bogojević, Miodrag Petrović, Mirjana Mihailović

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Biology International · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Biological Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleoproteinHaptoglobinMolecular biologyBiologyFetusGeneTranscription factorTranscription (linguistics)RibonucleoproteinEndocrinologyRNABiochemistryGeneticsPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to identify nucleoproteins involved in transcriptional regulation of the haptoglobin (Hp) gene, fetal rat livers of dams exposed to inflammation on day 19 of pregnancy were used. Previously observed acute phase-dependent elevation of Hp gene transcriptional activity in prenatal liver was accompanied by increased binding affinities of several fetal soluble nucleoproteins and the hormone response element (RE) of the Hp gene (-170/-56). One of these proteins, a hepatic nucleoprotein of 53 kDa, was identified by Western blotting analysis as a protein within the same molecular mass and epitopes as transcription factor p53. Also, in vitro phosphorylation experiments revealed that the examined fetal nucleoprotein could be liable to the same phosphorylative post-translational modification as p53. The obtained results suggest that the fetal 53 kDa-nucleoprotein could be a homologue of transcription factor p53, participating in the transcriptional modulation of the Hp gene throughout prenatal hepatic development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell Biology InternationalSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207