MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146506178 · doi:10.1109/83.988952

The quantized DCT and its application to DCT-based video coding

2002· article· en· W2146506178 on OpenAlexaff
Alen Docef, F. Kossentini, Khanh Nguuyen-Phi, I.R. Ismaeil

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscrete cosine transformTrellis quantizationQuantization (signal processing)EncoderAlgorithmTransform codingComputationLapped transformComputer scienceModified discrete cosine transformData compressionComputational complexity theoryCoding (social sciences)MathematicsImage compressionComputer visionImage processingImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The two-dimensional (2-D) discrete cosine transform (DCT) and the subsequent quantization of the transform coefficients are two computationally demanding steps of any DCT-based video encoder. In this paper, we propose an efficient joint implementation of these two steps, where the precision in computing the DCT can be exchanged for a reduction in the computational complexity. First, the quantization is embedded in the DCT, thus eliminating the need to explicitly quantize the transform coefficients. A multiplierless integer implementation of the quantized DCT (QDCT) is then proposed that performs shift and add operations instead of full multiplications. A sequence of multiplierless QDCT algorithms is obtained with increasing precision and number of computations. Finally, further savings in computations are obtained by terminating the DCT computations whenever intermediate results indicate that the transform and quantization steps will likely result in a block of zero values. The proposed algorithms are applied to, and results are presented for, high-quality MPEG-2 and low bit rate H.263 video encoding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Image ProcessingSame topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207