MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146510544 · doi:10.1109/isie.2006.295980

Real-Time Simulation of Permanent Magnet Motor Drive on FPGA Chip for High-Bandwidth Controller Tests and Validation

2006· article· en· W2146510544 on OpenAlexaff
Christian Dufour, Simon Abourida, Jean Bélanger

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsOpal-Rt Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReal-time simulationComputer scienceHardware-in-the-loop simulationField-programmable gate arrayVHDLSettling timeMotor drivePulse-width modulationEmbedded systemSimulationVoltageControl engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringStep response

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a real-time simulator of a permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) drive implemented on an FPGA card. Real-time simulation of PMSM drives enables rapid deployment and thorough testing of efficient control strategies for vehicular or industrial applications. The PMSM model is based on Park transform with a reference frame on the rotor and assumes sinusoidal flux induction. The PMSM machine in driven by a 3-phase IGBT inverter. Both models are implemented in RT-LAB using a Simulink blockset called Xilinx System Generator (XSG), without any VHDL coding. The paper explains various aspects of the design of the motor drive models in fixed-point representation in XSG, as well as actual simulation validations against a standard PMSM drive model built in Simulink. The PMSM drive is coded along with a test PWM source, built-in the FPGA, with user selectable dead-time, modulation index, source angle offset and frequency. The overall model compilation and simulation is made entirely automatic under the RT-LAB real-time simulation platform. The drive can also run in closed loop with a controller executed on a CPU of the real-time simulator. The final PMSM drive model runs with a 20 ns integration time step, allows for time multiplexing of d-q values and has an input-output latency of 310 ns (250 ns for the PMSM machine alone). The drive is directly connected to RT-LAB digital input and analog outputs (1 microsecond settling time) on the FPGA card and has a resulting total HIL latency of 1.31 microseconds

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207