Bibliographic record
Abstract
La valeur du « nous » a pris du plomb dans l’aile, par-delà les sphères du couple, de la famille, de l’équipe sportive et du partenariat d’entreprise. Ce texte tâche de formuler, à l’échelle de « l’infiniment moyen » dans la vie de l’individu aujourd’hui, le délicat passage (mixte indémêlable dans sa contingence au quotidien) du « symbolisme agrégatif » au « symbolisme sociatif », dont Nicolas Abraham avait livré l’esquisse phénoménologique en 1961. L’occasion perdue ici cadrée serait double : 1) imaginer le retour sur soi de la génération de Québécois nés entre 1960 et 1972, via l’hypothèse d’une bande de six Montréalais, composée à l’aune des « significations imaginaires sociales » de Cornelius Castoriadis et de la sociologie de Danilo Martuccelli; et 2) penser quelle sera(it), élaborée ainsi rétrospectivement, la transformation quasi imperceptible de cette génération entre 2000 et 2010, à travers certaines modifications transversales opérant dans la vie de ces six, de façon plus conséquente qu’auparavant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".