MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146575848 · doi:10.1115/detc2008-49265

Instantaneous Kinemato-Static Model of Planar Compliant Parallel Mechanisms

2008· article· en· W2146575848 on OpenAlexaff
Cyril Quennouelle, Clément Gosselin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinematicsJacobian matrix and determinantCompliant mechanismControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceActuatorMechanism (biology)Simple (philosophy)Matrix (chemical analysis)PlanarFunction (biology)Four-bar linkageTopology (electrical circuits)Motion (physics)MathematicsFinite element methodEngineeringApplied mathematicsClassical mechanicsArtificial intelligencePhysicsStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the number of degrees of freedom, the kinematic constraints, the pose of the end-effector and the static constraints that lead to the Kinemato-Static Model of a Compliant Mechanism are introduced. A formulation is then provided for the Instantaneous Kinemato-Static Model. This new model enables to calculate the variation of the pose as a linear function of the motion of the actuators and the variation of the external loads through two new matrices: the compliant Jacobian matrix and the matrix of compliance that give a simple and meaningful formulation of the model of the mechanism.r Finally, a simple application to a 4-bar mechanism is presented to illustrate the use of this model and the new possibilities that it opens, notably the study of the kinematics for any range of applied load.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207