Du surmenage professionnel au burn-out : réponses sociales et issues individuelles aux difficultés du travail d’hier et d’aujourd’hui
Bibliographic record
Abstract
De nos jours, les travailleurs affirment ne pas seulement retirer des désagréments, des insatisfactions et de la souffrance des réformes managériales post-tayloriennes, qui exigent une mobilisation de soi accrue dans le procès de production. Il arrive également que le travail soit pour eux le moyen de mettre à profit leurs talents, leur créativité et leurs compétences, bref, de s’accomplir personnellement. À partir de l’analyse de la plainte de deux formes de « pathologie » du travail, lesurmenage professionnelet leburn-out, l’article cherche à comprendre de quelle manière l’intensification de la dynamique de mobilisation-rétribution de la subjectivité du travailleur orienterait, parmi d’autres facteurs, l’expérience plus ou moins satisfaisante ou douloureuse que l’individu fait du travail dans la période contemporaine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".