MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146637207 · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2003.055665

Activation and integration of bilateral GABA‐mediated synaptic inputs in neonatal rat sympathetic preganglionic neurones <i>in vitro</i>

2003· article· en· W2146637207 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew Whyment, Jennifer Wilson, Leo P. Renaud, David Spanswick

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersBritish Heart FoundationHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsMuscimolPostsynaptic potentialBicucullineGABAA receptorInhibitory postsynaptic potentialChemistryNeuroscienceNeurotransmissionNBQXStimulationBiophysicsGlutamate receptorReceptorBiologyAMPA receptorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role of GABA receptors in synaptic transmission to neonatal rat sympathetic preganglionic neurones (SPNs) was investigated utilizing whole-cell patch clamp recording techniques in longitudinal and transverse spinal cord slice preparations. In the presence of glutamate receptor antagonists (NBQX, 5 microm and D-APV, 10 microm), electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral or contralateral lateral funiculi (iLF and cLF, respectively) revealed monosynaptic inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) in 75% and 65% of SPNs, respectively. IPSPs were sensitive to bicuculline (10 microM) in all neurones tested and reversed polarity around -55 mV, the latter indicating mediation via chloride conductances. In three neurones IPSPs evoked by stimulation of the iLF (n = 1) or cLF (n = 2) were partly sensitive to strychnine (2 microM). The expression of postsynaptic GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors were confirmed by the sensitivity of SPNs to agonists, GABA (2 mm), muscimol (10-100 microM) or baclofen (10-100 microM), in the presence of TTX, each of which produced membrane hyperpolarization in all SPNs tested. Muscimol-induced responses were sensitive to bicuculline (1-10 microM) and SR95531 (10 microM) and baclofen-induced responses were sensitive to 2-hydroxy-saclofen (100-200 microM) and CGP55845 (200 nM). The GABA(C) receptor agonist CACA (200 microM) was without significant effect on SPNs. These results suggest that SPNs possess postsynaptic GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors and that subsets of SPNs receive bilateral GABAergic inputs which activate GABA(A) receptors, coupled to a chloride conductance. At resting or holding potentials close to threshold either single or bursts (10-100 Hz) of IPSPs gave rise to a rebound excitation and action potential firing at the termination of the burst. This effect was mimicked by injection of small (10-20 pA) rectangular-wave current pulses, which revealed a time-dependent, Cs(+)-sensitive inward rectification and rebound excitation at the termination of the response to current injection. Synaptic activation of a rebound excitation mediated by a time-dependent inward rectification expressed intrinsically by SPNs may provide a novel mechanism enabling SPNs to be entrained to rhythms driven from the brainstem or higher centres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleepFrench-language works237,207