Interpretation of borehole gravity data of the Lalor volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit, Snow Lake, Manitoba, Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We have acquired borehole gravity data along five drillholes intersecting the Lalor volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit hosted in the eastern Flin Flon greenstone belt at Snow Lake, Manitoba, Canada. Inverted apparent interval density (IAID) logs were calculated from the borehole gravity data and compared with lithofacies and Zr/TiO2 logs; the latter of which is a geochemical proxy for differentiating volcanic rocks of felsic to mafic composition. The IAID anomalies predominantly reflect alternating mafic and felsic volcanic rock units in the footwall and hanging wall of the massive sulfide deposit. IAID lows are associated with Zr/TiO2 highs that correspond to rhyolite and rhyodacite intervals in the hanging wall. IAID lows with associated Zr/TiO2 peaks in the footwall occur within intervals of gneiss and schist formed by metamorphism of hydrothermally altered rocks, suggesting that these IAID lows still reflect the felsic composition of their volcanic protoliths. A significant peak-to-peak Bouguer anomaly of 0.66 mGal caused by an estimated excess mass of 0.7 mT can be correlated with gamma-gamma density signature of the main sulfide ore zone in three boreholes. This anomaly is aligned with the ore zone after restoring the displacement along a northeast-dipping structure. When integrated with drillhole lithology and lithogeochemistry logs, gravity borehole data can, in addition to the direct detection of mineralization, be used as a subsurface geological mapping tool.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it