MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146700789 · doi:10.1109/tdc.1991.169487

Separable insulated connector loadbreak testing. I. The switching characteristic and its implications

2002· article· en· W2146700789 on OpenAlexaff
R. Filter, Joseph Mintz, D.M. Cherney

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 1991 IEEE Power Engineering Society Transmission and Distribution Conference · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Reliability and Maintenance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooHydro One (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCable glandReliability (semiconductor)Separable spaceReliability engineeringVoltageComputer scienceService (business)Electrical engineeringElectronic engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)EngineeringMathematicsTelecommunicationsPhysicsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Separable insulated connector switching reliability has become a concern for some utilities, particularly at higher distribution voltages. To facilitate assessments of in-service switching reliability, a second generation switching characteristic has been developed for use during laboratory loadbreak tests. This new switching characteristic is one step towards a realistic reliability assessment of separable connector switching. First generation switching characteristics are compared to the newly developed characteristic to demonstrate that the latter stresses separable connectors more realistically. A laboratory test protocol using the switching characteristic is proposed.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 1991 IEEE Power Engineering Society Transmission and Distribution ConferenceSame topicPower System Reliability and MaintenanceFrench-language works237,207