MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146719767 · doi:10.1177/0142064x0402700204

‘The Commandment which is for Life’ (Romans 7.10): Sin’s Use of the Obedience of Faith

2004· article· en· W2146719767 on OpenAlexaff
L. Ann Jervis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal for the Study of the New Testament · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoWycliffe College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTorahObedienceInterpretation (philosophy)FaithPhilosophyAppealTheologyReading (process)LiteratureJudaismLawArtLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chapter 7 of Romans has been the focus of a vigorous debate over whether Paul’s discourse is focused on the pre-Christ or the post-Christ experience. This discussion has not extended to the interpretation of 7.9-11, however. Scholars on both sides of the debate appeal to Gen. 2 and 3 to explain these verses. At the same time, despite the fact that the Genesis story takes place well before the giving of Torah, scholars understand the ‘commandment’ to which Paul refers in these verses as a commandment of Torah. This convoluted but common reading is here called into question and a new proposal advanced: the commandment to which Paul refers in Rom 7.9-12 is the commandment inherent to life in Christ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.330
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal for the Study of the New TestamentSame topicBiblical Studies and InterpretationFrench-language works237,207