The effects of early isolation on sexual behavior and c‐fos expression in naïve male long‐evans rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous findings have demonstrated that the maternal environment is important for the development of male sexual behavior. The present study examined the effects of complete early life isolation and replacement 'stroking' stimulation on male sexual behavior and neural activation as seen by Fos immunoreactivity (Fos-IR). Animals were either artificially reared (AR) with minimal (AR-MIN) or maximal (AR-MAX) body simulation, or maternally reared (MR). In adulthood, animals were either given an exposure to an estrous female (EXP) or left undisturbed (NoEXP). No significant effects of early development were found in sexual behavior; however differences in activation in response to this exposure were observed. AR-MIN animals showed lower Fos-IR in the medial preoptic area and the ventromedial hypothalamus compared to MR animals. AR-MAX animals were not significantly different from either condition. These findings demonstrate that although there are no differences in the quality of the first copulatory exposure between AR and MR animals, the brain's response to this exposure differs in sites within the brain that subserve sexual behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".