MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146771110 · doi:10.3109/17482960903273056

Cyanobacteria and BMAA: Possible linkage with avian vacuolar myelinopathy (AVM) in the south-eastern United States

2009· article· en· W2146771110 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert R. Bidigare, Stephanie Christensen, Susan B. Wilde, Sandra Anne Banack

Bibliographic record

VenueAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Science Foundation
KeywordsHydrillaWaterfowlBiologyCyanobacteriaEcosystemEcologyWetlandAquatic plantHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Avian vacuolar myelinopathy (AVM) is a neurological disease that produces uncoordinated behavior in affected birds in wetland ecosystems of the south-eastern United States. Feeding and sentinel trials, field surveys, and genetic studies have implicated the introduced flowering plant species Hydrilla verticillata (Hydrocharitaceae) and an associated epiphytic cyanobacterial species (Order Stigonematales) as a causal link to AVM. All five morphotypes of cyanobacteria have been shown to produce the neurotoxic amino acid BMAA, including cyanobacteria of the Stigonematales that are epiphytic on Hydrilla verticillata. If biomagnification of BMAA occurs in these wetland ecosystems, as has been observed in the Guam ecosystem, then the consumption of fish (e.g. shad and herring) and waterfowl (e.g. Canada geese and mallards) from AVM-confirmed reservoirs in Arkansas, Texas, Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina could represent a significant human health risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisSame topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsFrench-language works237,207