MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146779595 · doi:10.1109/smi.2002.1003554

Shape matching of 3D contours using normalized Fourier descriptors

2003· article· en· W2146779595 on OpenAlexaff
Hao Zhang, Eugene Fiume

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNormalization (sociology)Fourier transformAlgorithmSmoothingMathematicsFourier seriesVertex (graph theory)Eigenvalues and eigenvectorsArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysisComputer visionComputer scienceCombinatoricsPhysicsGraph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop a simple, eigenspace matching algorithm for closed 3D contours. Our algorithm relies on a novel method which normalizes the Fourier descriptors (FDs) of a 3D contour with respect to two of its FD coefficients corresponding to the lowest non-zero frequencies. The remaining matching task only involves vertex shift and rotation about the z-axis. Our approach is inspired by the observation that the traditional Fourier transform of a 1D signal is equivalent to the decomposition of the signal into a linear combination of the eigenvectors of a smoothing operator. It turns out that our FD normalization is equivalent to aligning the limit plane approached by the sequence of progressively smoothed 3D contours with the xy-plane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207