Respiratory and metabolic effects of decreased osmolality in conscious rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigated the respiratory and metabolic effects of decreased osmolality, and the potential roles of angiotensin II (ANG II) and the subfornical organ (SFO) in mediating these effects, in conscious Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. Gastric water loading was induced either by oral gavage or an externalized indwelling stomach tube (20 mL x kg(-1) distilled water at body temperature). Repeated measurements after oral gavage were obtained with and without water loading and with and without ANG II receptor block (saralasin, 1.3 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) iv). At 15 min after water loading by oral gavage, ventilation (V, 1.14+/-0.08 L x kg(-1) x min(-1)) and tidal volume (10.7+/-0.6 mL x kg(-1)) were transiently higher (P < 0.05), at a time when plasma osmolality was decreased (-8+/-1 mOsm), compared with gavage tube alone (0.95+/-0.08 L x kg(-1) min(-1) and 9.1+/-0.7 mL x kg(-1), respectively). However, water loading via stomach tube did not stimulate V; only during the 60-s period of water infusion did V increase briefly, but this was due to increased respiratory frequency. Dye indicators demonstrated that oral gavage exposes upper airway and esophageal afferents to water, presumably accounting for respiratory stimulation. Lesions of the SFO did not affect respiration or metabolism. A decrease in osmolality, associated with both water loading techniques, caused a sustained increase in oxygen consumption (Vo2 ) and a decrease in the V/Vo2 ratio. ANG II receptor block reduced the Vo2 response and prevented the decrease in V/Vo2 following water loading by oral gavage, but did not affect the transient stimulation of V. Unlike larger mammals, decreased osmolality does not stimulate respiration in the SD rat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".