L’éducation et la formation tout au long de la vie : une orientation européenne, des régimes d’action publique et des modèles nationaux en évolution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Restituant la genèse de l’approche européenne de l’éducation et de la formation tout au long de la vie (EFTLV), ce texte montre qu’elle est la résultante complexe et évolutive de diverses conceptions sociopolitiques. Par l’entremise d’un benchmarking institutionnalisé, elle met en scène la confrontation de systèmes nationaux dont les objectifs et les régulations diffèrent profondément. Afin de rendre compte de cette diversité intra-européenne, il est proposé une analyse des régimes d’action publique en matière d’EFTLV. Distinguant cinq régimes (académique, corporatiste, universaliste, marchand et de partenariat public-privé), cette analyse construit une lecture en dynamique des positionnements sociétaux de cinq systèmes nationaux (Allemagne, Danemark, France, Royaume-Uni, Suède).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".