MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2146859698 · doi:10.1136/ebmental-2012-100713

Review: evidence on the comparative effectiveness and adverse effects of antipsychotics in young people is limited

2012· letter· en· W2146859698 on OpenAlexaff
Pratibha Reebye, Dean Elbe

Bibliographic record

VenueEvidence-Based Mental Health · 2012
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalChildren's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdverse effectMedicinePsychiatryPsychologyIntensive care medicinePharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Review: evidence on the comparative effectiveness and adverse effects of antipsychotics in young people is limited QUESTION Question: What is the evidence on the comparative effectiveness and safety of the antipsychotics for children and young adults with psychiatric and behavioural conditions?Outcomes: Efficacy outcomes (disorder specific and nonspecific symptoms; health-related quality of life; legal involvement; medication adherence; patient, parent-or care provider-reported outcomes; suicide-related behaviour); adverse events (dyslipidaemia, extrapyramidal symptoms, insulin resistance, prolactin-related and sexual side effects, sedation, weight and body composition).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEvidence-Based Mental HealthSame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207