Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we describe a statistical model for the gradient vector field of the gray level in images validated by different experiments. Moreover, we present a global constrained Markov model for contours in images that uses this statistical model for the likelihood. Our model is amenable to an Iterative Conditional Estimation (ICE) procedure for the estimation of the parameters; our model also allows segmentation by means of the Simulated Annealing (SA) algorithm, the Iterated Conditional Modes (ICM) algorithm, or the Modes of Posterior Marginals (MPM) Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm. This yields an original unsupervised statistical method for edge-detection, with three variants. The estimation and the segmentation procedures have been tested on a total of 160 images. Those tests indicate that the model and its estimation are valid for applications that require an energy term based on the log-likelihood ratio. Besides edge-detection, our model can be used for semiautomatic extraction of contours, localization of shapes, non-photo-realistic rendering; more generally, it might be useful in various problems that require a statistical likelihood for contours.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".