MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2146959811 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2000.900430

A functional database for guidance of surgical and therapeutic procedures in the deep brain

2002· article· en· W2146959811 on OpenAlexaff
Kirk W. Finnis, Yves Starreveld, Andrew G. Parrent, Terry M. Peters

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal capsuleComputer scienceMicrostimulationVisualizationNeurosurgeryArtificial intelligenceDatabaseMedicineNeuroscienceRadiologyMagnetic resonance imagingPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current techniques for stereotactic neurosurgery of the deep brain require identification of targets by preoperative image localization. These structures are also surrounded by critical brain areas which must not be damaged by the surgical procedure. We have designed and implemented a searchable and expandable database of functional organization for the sensorimotor thalamus, internal capsule, and internal pallidum from a population of over 70 patients. Data were obtained through microcellular recording, microstimulation, and macrostimulation mapping performed during stereotaetic thalamotomies and pallidotomies. These data may be in turn registered to a patient 3D MRI within our image guided visualization platform. This functional database, provides a visual representation of functional organization in the deep brain, facilitating physiological exploration and preoperative planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeurological disorders and treatments→French-language works237,207→