Myocardial storage of chondroitin sulfate-containing moieties in Costello syndrome patients with severe hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Costello syndrome is a distinctive multiple congenital anomaly syndrome, characterized by loose soft skin with deep palmar and plantar creases, loose joints, distinctive coarse facial features, skeletal abnormalities, cardiac abnormalities (cardiovascular malformation (CVM), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, tachycardia), predisposition to malignancy, developmental delays, and mental retardation. Previous studies with cultured fibroblasts from individuals with Costello syndrome demonstrate excessive accumulation of chondroitin sulfate-bearing proteoglycans, associated with both impaired formation of elastic fibers and an unusually high rate of cellular proliferation. Despite multiple clinical reports of cardiac abnormalities, there has been only one previously published report describing post-mortem findings in hearts from Costello syndrome patients. Here we provide a detailed description of the post-mortem findings of the hearts of three children with Costello syndrome. Routine histological examination and results of targeted histochemical and immunohistochemical studies revealed that in addition to cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, these hearts also demonstrated massive pericellular and intracellular accumulation of chondroitin sulfate-bearing proteoglycans and a marked reduction of elastic fibers. Normal stroma was replaced by multifocal collagenous fibrosis. Most peculiar was the finding that the bulk of the chondroitin sulfate accumulated in these Costello syndrome hearts is a chondroitin-6-sulfate. In contrast, deposition of chondroitin-4 sulfate was below the level detected in normal hearts. We propose that an imbalance in sulfation of chondroitin sulfate molecules and subsequent accumulation of chondroitin-6-sulfate in cardiomyocytes contribute to the development of the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy of Costello syndrome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".