Le comportement d’internationalisation des PME suisses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objectif de cette étude est de mettre en évidence les facteurs qui incitent une entreprise à adopter une trajectoire d’expansion traditionnelle ou plutôt de type « born global », facteurs généralement présentés comme contradictoires par les chercheurs. Pour ce faire, un modèle destiné à prédire le mode d’expansion a été testé empiriquement. L’analyse de 215 PME en Suisse permet de tirer des conclusions intéressantes pour les praticiens. Parmi celles-ci, relevons que la majorité des entreprises exportent au plus dans cinq pays, et que, de ce point de vue, l’Allemagne est le partenaire le plus important des PME suisses, le marché allemand servant de marché test. L’étude fait ressortir clairement le fait que plus les entreprises sont jeunes, plus le temps qu’elles prennent pour s’internationaliser est court. Cela implique que les entreprises établies de longue date doivent s’attendre à une concurrence féroce de la part d’entreprises nouvellement créées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".