MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147072043 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2004.836596

Distribution Functions of Selection Combiner Output in Equally Correlated Rayleigh, Rician, and Nakagami-<tex>$m$</tex>Fading Channels

2004· article· en· W2147072043 on OpenAlexaff
Yunfei Chen, Chintha Tellambura

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRician fadingNakagami distributionRayleigh fadingFadingFading distributionCumulative distribution functionMathematicsStatisticsSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Channel capacityRayleigh distributionChannel (broadcasting)AlgorithmTelecommunicationsProbability density functionComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop a novel approach to derive the cumulative distribution functions (cdfs) of the selection-combining (SC) output signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in equally correlated Rayleigh, Ricean, and Nakagami-m fading channels. We show that a set of equally correlated channel gains can be transformed into a set of conditionally independent channel gains. Single-fold integral expressions are, therefore, derived for the cdfs of the SC output SNR. Infinite series representations of the output cdfs are also provided. New expressions are applied to analyze the average error rate, the outage probability, and the output statistics of SC. Numerical and simulation results that illustrate the effect of fading correlation on the performance of L-branch SC in equally correlated fading channels are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations273
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207