MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147074541 · doi:10.1139/t08-104

Horizontal pressure on barricades for backfilled stopes. Part I: Fully drained conditions

2009· article· en· W2147074541 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Li Li, Michel Aubertin

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInstitut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringPore water pressureBase (topology)Stress (linguistics)EngineeringGeologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stope backfilling is used in underground mines to provide a safer working space for personnel and machinery. To ensure a secure application of backfill, it is critical to accurately evaluate the pressures exerted on the walls and barricades placed near the base of the stope to retain the fill materials. In this paper, existing solutions for evaluating the stresses on barricades are reviewed. The authors then propose a new three-dimensional analytical solution that takes into account the stress transfer from the backfill to the walls in both the stope and access drift. In particular, the solution considers the influence of the barricade position within the drift on the stress state. Comparisons are made between the proposed solution, physical model test results, and numerical simulations. The good agreement between various results indicates that the proposed formulation provides a good estimate of the pressure on a barricade. The solution presented here is applicable to fully drained backfill (without water-pore pressure); the solution for saturated backfill is given in a companion paper (see Part II, this issue).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score0.694

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicRock Mechanics and ModelingFrench-language works237,207