Horizontal pressure on barricades for backfilled stopes. Part I: Fully drained conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stope backfilling is used in underground mines to provide a safer working space for personnel and machinery. To ensure a secure application of backfill, it is critical to accurately evaluate the pressures exerted on the walls and barricades placed near the base of the stope to retain the fill materials. In this paper, existing solutions for evaluating the stresses on barricades are reviewed. The authors then propose a new three-dimensional analytical solution that takes into account the stress transfer from the backfill to the walls in both the stope and access drift. In particular, the solution considers the influence of the barricade position within the drift on the stress state. Comparisons are made between the proposed solution, physical model test results, and numerical simulations. The good agreement between various results indicates that the proposed formulation provides a good estimate of the pressure on a barricade. The solution presented here is applicable to fully drained backfill (without water-pore pressure); the solution for saturated backfill is given in a companion paper (see Part II, this issue).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".