MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147120642 · doi:10.1345/aph.10251

Pharmacokinetics of Morphine and its Glucuronidated Metabolites in Burn Injuries

2001· article· en· W2147120642 on OpenAlexaff
Sylvie Perreault, Manon Choinière, Patrick B du Souich, François Bellavance, Gilles Beauregard

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Pharmacotherapy · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Opioid Use
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMorphineMedicinePharmacokineticsAnesthesiaUrinePharmacologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of major thermal burn injury and continuous intravenous morphine infusion on the disposition of morphine and its glucuronidated metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) once a week for three weeks. CASE SUMMARIES: Five patients with major first-, second-, or third-degree burn injuries received long-term intravenous morphine infusion. The required dose varied greatly (from 4 to 39.5 mg/h). The steady-state concentrations of morphine, M3G, and M6G ranged from 20 to 452, 29 to 3436, and 20 to 1240 mumol/L, respectively. The systemic clearance (Cls) of morphine ranged from 14.8 to 40.3 mL/min/kg and did not change over time. The ratios of M6G and M3G to morphine were not affected by dose, even with the wide variation of intravenous dosage. Morphine kinetics appeared to be first-order. Mean recovery of morphine, M3G, and M6G in urine was 1.7 +/- 1.0%, 42.0 +/- 16.8%, and 11.8 +/- 3.2%, respectively, and renal clearance ranged from 8 to 64, 26 to 325, and 59 to 589 mL/min, respectively. Mean pain intensity ratings at rest remained low and stable (0.7 +/- 0.9 on day 7, 0.4 +/- 0.3 on day 14, 0 +/- 0 on day 21). DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first published report describing morphine, M3G, and M6G disposition in patients with major thermal burn injury. The Cls of morphine is similar to that observed in other patient populations and healthy subjects, suggesting that the presence of major burn injuries or a continuous morphine infusion over a three-week period may not contribute significantly to the variability among individuals. In these cases, the renal clearance of morphine and its glucuronides was within the range of values reported for other populations of patients and healthy subjects. Recovery of morphine and its glucuronides in urine was also similar to that in healthy individuals. CONCLUSIONS: These cases suggest that the effects of major burn injuries and of long-term intravenous infusion of morphine did not seem to modify morphine, M3G, and M6G disposition. Among patients with burn injuries, the severity of burns of duration of administration are not a cause of nonlinear kinetic of morphine or of morphine resistance. The morphine infusion rate was substantially variable and not directly related to its clearance, suggesting that monitoring of morphine should be focused on the clinical response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.640

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of PharmacotherapySame topicPain Management and Opioid UseFrench-language works237,207