Structural characterization of the antigenic capsular polysaccharide and lipopolysaccharide O-chain produced by <i>Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae</i> serotype 15
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The specific capsular polysaccharide produced by Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 15 was determined to be a high-molecular-mass polymer having [alpha]D + 69 degrees (water) and composed of a linear backbone of phosphate diester linked disaccharide units of 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-D-glucose (D-GlcNAc) and 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-D-galactose (D-GalNAc) residues (1:1). Thirty percent of the D-GalNAc residues were substituted at O-4 by beta-D-galactopyranose (beta-D-Galp) residues. Through the application of chemical and NMR methods, the capsule, which defines the serotype specificity of the bacterium, was found to have the structure [structure: see text]. The O-polysaccharide (O-PS) component of the A. pleuro pneumoniae serotype 15 lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was characterized as a linear unbranched polymer of repeating pentasaccharide units composed of D-glucose (2 parts) and D-galactose (3 parts), shown to have the structure [structure: see text]. The O-PS was chemically identical with the O-antigen previously identified in the LPSs produced by A. pleuro pneumoniae serotypes 3 and 8.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".