MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147145409 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1998.682569

Implementation and evaluation of an accurate real-time voiceband signal classifier

2002· article· en· W2147145409 on OpenAlexaff
B.F. Cockburn, Devesh Sarda

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLinear discriminant analysisQuadratic classifierArtificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionPattern recognition (psychology)Classifier (UML)AutocorrelationDemodulationBinary decision diagramMathematicsAlgorithmChannel (broadcasting)StatisticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the implementation and resulting accuracy of an economical voiceband signal classifier developed for use in the public switched telephone network. Companded digital signals are extracted from a 1.544 Mbps T1 digital trunk and then classified into either silence or twelve other active categories, including speech, four classes of data modem, three classes of fax, random binary data, fax signalling, ringback signal, and dual tone multifrequency (DTMF) digits. The classifier first derives from the baseband signal in each channel the central second-order moment and the first ten lags of the autocorrelation sequence, all normalized with respect to average power. Avoiding demodulation and Fourier transform steps in the classification process permits linear and quadratic discriminant functions to be computed in real time for all 24 T1 channels. Classification accuracies are reported for statistically optimal linear discriminant functions over classification intervals ranging from 31.5 to 256.5 ms. Also given are the greater accuracies achievable using statistically optimal quadratic discriminant functions and an automatically trained decision tree known as an adaptive logic network (ALN).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.669

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207