MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147154566 · doi:10.7202/1005126ar

Échos de la négritude césairienne chez Gaston Miron et Paul Chamberland

2011· article· fr· W2147154566 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ching Selao

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix et Images · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Cultural and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gaston Miron et Paul Chamberland ont tous deux affirmé avoir été influencés par la poésie d’Aimé Césaire, dont l’impact du célèbre Cahier d’un retour au pays natal dans le milieu littéraire québécois des années 60 a créé un petit mouvement de « négritude blanche ». De manière intéressante, et sans doute paradoxale, ce sont pourtant les différences qui ressortent de cette influence, comme si Césaire avait représenté un idéal poétique et de libération impossible à atteindre au Québec. Cet article offre d’abord un survol du contexte littéraire qui a permis la réception favorable des écrits de Césaire, figure d’altérité positive pour plusieurs poètes québécois, avant de proposer une lecture parallèle du Cahier et des poèmes de Miron et de Chamberland.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVoix et ImagesSame topicDiverse Cultural and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207