MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147181525 · doi:10.1109/pes.2004.1373021

Full frequency dependent line model for electromagnetic transient simulation including lumped and distributed sources

2004· article· en· W2147181525 on OpenAlexaff
Abner Ramirez, J.L. Naredo, P. Moreno

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004. · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmtpLaplace transformTransient (computer programming)Line (geometry)Computer scienceDistributed element modelTransmission lineElectric power transmissionPartial differential equationElectronic engineeringAcousticsPhysicsMathematical analysisEngineeringMathematicsTelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringGeometryElectric power system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. This paper describes a new full frequency dependent line model based on finite differences and the method of characteristics from the theory of partial differential equations. This model is well suited for handling distributed sources and is proposed as complement to the existing traveling wave based approaches, particularly for studies requiring line subdivisions. Three application examples are included in the paper. The first consists of a line excited by an externally radiated field. Comparisons with the EMTP illustrate the advantages of the new model over the traveling wave methods when lines must be subdivided. The next two examples demonstrate the applicability of the new model to long homogeneous lines and cables. In these cases, comparisons with the numerical Laplace transform show its remarkable accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.389
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004.Same topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207