MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147241738 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2006.376838

Adaptive Teleoperation Control using Online Estimate of Operator's Arm Damping

2006· article· en· W2147241738 on OpenAlexafffund
Farid Mobasser, Keyvan Hashtrudi-Zaad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTeleoperation and Haptic Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTeleoperationControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)TeleroboticsRobotic armComputer scienceAdaptive controlPosition (finance)ForearmSimulationEngineeringRobotArtificial intelligenceMobile robotControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indirect adaptive bilateral teleoperation controllers have been designed to provide compromise between stability and performance in the presence of time delays and uncertainties in operator and environment dynamics. So far, the controllers developed utilize online estimate of only environment impedance and they approximate the operator's arm highly time-varying dynamics with linear-time-invariant dynamic models. In this paper, a force-position teleoperation controller is implemented in which the master damping is adjusted in a dual manner based on the online estimate of operator's arm damping. To this purpose, a novel methodology for online estimation of forearm damping when arm movement is restricted to only elbow joint motion in horizontal plane is developed. The proposed scheme uses elbow joint angular position and velocity, and electromyogram signals collected from upper arm muscles in a radial basis function artificial neural network for online estimation of damping parameter. The adaptive bilateral controller has experimentally demonstrated superior performance and contact stability compared to a conventional force-position controller in the presence of communication delays

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTeleoperation and Haptic SystemsFrench-language works237,207