Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’organisation serielle des espaces disciplinaires, dont Michel Foucault dans Surveiller et punir en demontrait la vision, met en scene l’obsession avec laquelle nos societes modernes organisent l’espace. Dans les faits, l’architecture carcerale (betonnee ou sociale) doit prevoir le geste humain, l’orienter, l’eduquer, pour abolir la difference. Cette analyse propose d’etudier la representation panoptique dans le recit televise Prison Break de Paul Scheuring. Elle se concentrera sur la premiere saison qui suit, en parallele, le plan d’evasion du heros et l’autorite qu’exerce une mysterieuse compagnie sur le monde. En nous appuyant sur de brefs extraits et sur des considerations plus globales, nous tenterons de saisir la nature du duel que se menent l’espace utopique et l’espace pictural transgressif. A notre avis, cette serie demontre le paradoxe du corps dans un recit d’evasion, sa dissolution et son instrumentalisation, et developpe l’idee du piege comme motif esthetique et dramatique. The serial – or even cellular – organization of disciplinary spaces, as envisioned by Michel Foucault in Discipline and Punish, describes how obsessively modern societies organize space. The architectural design of the prison (concrete or social) must be proactive and must anticipate human gesture, guide it, educate it, in order to abolish difference. Therefore, this analysis proposes to study panoptic representation in the televised narrative Prison Break, by Paul Scheuring, in order to understand its transgressive aesthetic. By incessantly repeating the themes of confinement, loss of identity and omniscient power, both inside and outside its walls, the series develops the concept of being trapped as an aesthetic and dramatic moment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".