MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147252654 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2011.5946778

BEMD for expression transformation in face recognition

2011· article· en· W2147252654 on OpenAlexaff
Hoda Mohammadzade, Foteini Agrafioti, Jiexin Gao, Dimitrios Hatzinakos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTransformation (genetics)Artificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Face (sociological concept)Facial recognition systemExpression (computer science)BiometricsBivariate analysisFacial expressionLinear discriminant analysisHilbert–Huang transformIdentification (biology)Feature extractionImage (mathematics)Computer visionSpeech recognitionMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents a novel methodology for the transformation of facial expressions, to assist face biometrics. It is known that identification using only one image per subject poses a great challenge to recognizers. This is because drastic facial expressions introduce variability, on which the recognizer is not trained. The proposed framework uses only one image per subject to predict intra-class variability, by synthesizing new expressions, which are subsequently used to train the discriminant. The expression of the gallery is transformed using the bivariate empirical mode decomposition (BEMD), which allows for simultaneous analysis of the probe image and a targeted expression mask. We advocate that 2D BEMD is a powerful tool for multi-resolution face analysis. The performance of the proposed framework, tested over a database of 96 individuals, is 90% for an FAR of 1%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFace and Expression RecognitionFrench-language works237,207