MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147263224 · doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxu056

A Resilient P2P Architecture for Mobile Resource Sharing

2014· article· en· W2147263224 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Computer Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDistributed computingDelegateComputer networkOverhead (engineering)Context (archaeology)Protocol (science)Network topology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peer-to-peer (P2P) systems present a unique medium for resource sharing among cliques of participants (peers) in a distributed and self-organized manner. With the advent of mobile users and the increasing power of mobile devices, the spectrum of P2P capabilities should scale. Peers establish transient or persistent relationships with other peers based on mutual interest. Communicating peers may use intermediary peers to forward communication messages, if a direct link is beyond their communication range. A critical design parameter is establishing a resilient communication topology, yet reduce the overhead of control messages required to instill and maintain it. This rises as a significant hindrance in mobile environments, which pose additional challenges on P2P networks due to the heterogeneity of nodes, limited resources, dynamic contexts in addition to the inherited wireless network stringencies. Thus far, efforts in establishing P2P networks via super peers (SPs) have been capped by considering a subset of peer properties to evaluate their candidacy. This paper presents RobP2P, a robust architecture to construct mobile P2P networks and efficiently maintain network state. RobP2P introduces a SP selection protocol based on a dynamic score function that takes into account peers’ capabilities and context, such as location and quality of connectivity. The paper also presents an agile utility function through which SPs can delegate monitoring responsibilities to comparably powerful and stable peers to ensure self-healing topology maintenance. We present an elaborate performance evaluation of RobP2P implemented on Network Simulator NS-3. Our results illustrate the efficiency of RobP2P, its resilience to failures, and the improvements in lowering overhead traffic while reliably maintaining the consistency of network state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it