MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147316407 · doi:10.1109/icip.1994.413701

Transmission of the color information using quad-trees and segmentation-based approaches for the compression of color images with limited palette

2002· article· en· W2147316407 on OpenAlexaff
Mélanie Tremblay, A. Zaccarin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColor quantizationPalette (painting)Artificial intelligenceLossy compressionColor depthComputer visionColor spaceComputer scienceColor Cell CompressionColor imageColor histogramRGB color modelJPEGHigh colorChrominanceHistogram equalizationPixelColor balanceData compressionImage compressionLuminanceHistogramImage processingImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The compression of color images is usually performed independently along each of the 3 axis of a luminance-chrominance color space. When applied to images using a limited color palette, it generates images which take on more values than those found in the original color palette. These images must be color quantized before they can be displayed with a limited palette. In this paper, we present two new approaches for the lossy compression of color quantized images that does not require color quantization of the decoded images. The algorithms restrict the pixels of the decoded image to take values only in the original color palette. The first algorithm does so by using lists of colors taken by pixels in variable block sizes. The second one uses a color segmentation of the image. These two approaches improve the performance of previously proposed algorithms. For comparable quality and similar bit rate, the proposed approaches have lower decoding complexity than standard DCT-based coding algorithms.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Data Compression TechniquesFrench-language works237,207