MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2147333290 · doi:10.1002/cjs.11166

Fisher information matrix: A tool for dimension reduction, projection pursuit, independent component analysis, and more

2012· article· en· W2147333290 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Bruce G. Lindsay, Weixin Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Statistics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsFisher informationDimension (graph theory)Dimensionality reductionPrincipal component analysisProjection pursuitMatrix (chemical analysis)MathematicsSufficient dimension reductionProjection (relational algebra)StatisticsData MatrixMarkov chainMultivariate statisticsComputer scienceAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hui & Lindsay (2010) proposed a new dimension reduction method for multivariate data. It was based on the so‐called white noise matrices derived from the Fisher information matrix. Their theory and empirical studies demonstrated that this method can detect interesting features from high‐dimensional data even with a moderate sample size. The theoretical emphasis in that paper was the detection of non‐normal projections. In this paper we show how to decompose the information matrix into non‐negative definite information terms in a manner akin to a matrix analysis of variance. Appropriate information matrices will be identified for diagnostics for such important modern modelling techniques as independent component models, Markov dependence models, and spherical symmetry. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 40: 712–730; 2012 © 2012 Statistical Society of Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of StatisticsSame topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207